Follow The Logic of Science on Facebook.
- Follow The Logic of Science on WordPress.com
Archives
- November 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (3)
- June 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (8)
- February 2015 (10)
- January 2015 (17)
Tag Archives: scientific consensus
How to find and access peer-reviewed studies (for free)
The peer-reviewed literature is where scientists publish their research, and it is the source for scientific information. As a result, I spend a lot of time on this blog talking about it. I have explained how the peer-review system works … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged cherry picking, evaluating evidence, peer-reviewed studies, scientific consensus
14 Comments
Don’t cherry pick your experts
The appeal to authority fallacy is one of the most common logical fallacies in internet debates. It is a favorite tactic among climate change deniers, anti-vaccers, young earth creationists, and pretty much anyone else who rejects “mainstream” science. I previously … Continue reading
Windows into Science: Scientific Conferences
I am writing this on my way home from attending two scientific conferences. These meetings are critical components of the modern scientific enterprise, and they provide a lot of insights into how science works, so I thought it would be … Continue reading
Vaccines and autism: A thorough review of the evidence (2019 update)
One of the most common concerns that people have about vaccines is that they might cause (or exacerbate) autism. This idea is perpetuated by celebrities and innumerable websites, and it has become one of the cornerstone arguments of the anti-vaccine … Continue reading
Acupuncture is just a placebo
Acupuncture is an extremely popular form of complementary alternative medicine (CAM) that has even worked its way into many “integrative” hospitals. It is also fiercely defended by its believers. Unfortunately, it is not well defended by actual evidence, so I … Continue reading
Courts don’t determine scientific facts
Most people have probably seen the recent news that Monsanto has been ordered to pay $289 million following the ruling by a California jury that Monsanto’s glyphosate (a.k.a. Roundup) is dangerous and likely contributed to Dewayne Johnson’s cancer. I could … Continue reading
Posted in Nature of Science, Rules of Logic
Tagged Bad arguments, cherry picking, GMOs, scientific consensus
54 Comments
Most anti-GMO papers contain serious flaws
Unfortunately, bad papers sometimes get published, and those faulty results often get hailed by members of the anti-science community as evidence for their positions. As a result, it is extremely important to both look at the entire body of literature … Continue reading
Posted in GMO
Tagged evaluating evidence, GMOs, peer-reviewed studies, scientific consensus
7 Comments