Tag Archives: peer-reviewed studies

10 steps for evaluating scientific papers

Posted on August 3, 2015 by Fallacy Man

In the past few weeks, you have probably seen or heard claims that a new study has found that GMOs contain dangerous levels of formaldehyde; however, the reality is that the study itself is questionable at best, and the claims … Continue reading →

More Galleries | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Debunking “10 scientific studies proving GMOs can be harmful to human health”

Posted on July 20, 2015 by Fallacy Man

I recently stumbled across an article titled “10 Scientific Studies Proving GMOs Can Be Harmful To Human Health.” This article was written by Collective Evolution, which is a site that is right up there with Natural News and Whale.to for … Continue reading →

Posted in GMO | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Basic Statistics Part 3: The Dangers of Large Data Sets: A Tale of P values, Error Rates, and Bonferroni Corrections

Posted on April 7, 2015 by Fallacy Man

In previous posts, I have explained the importance of having lots of data, but what I failed to mention was the dangers of analyzing these large data sets. You see, all real data has variation in it, and when you … Continue reading →

Posted in Nature of Science | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

2 biggest lies of the anti-vaccine movement

Posted on March 22, 2015 by Fallacy Man

It’s no great secret that the anti-vaccine movement is rife with scientific inaccuracies and logical fallacies, but a few of their claims are so extraordinarily erroneous and demonstrably false that I have difficulty calling them anything other lies. There are … Continue reading →

Posted in Vaccines/Alternative Medicine | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on 2 biggest lies of the anti-vaccine movement

Peer-reviewed literature: What does it take to publish a scientific paper?

Posted on March 4, 2015 by Fallacy Man

Modern science publishes research through a careful peer-review system, and it is the peer-reviewed literature that scientists rely on for their information. Nevertheless, the peer-review system is very poorly understood among the general public, and opponents of science tend to … Continue reading →

Posted in Nature of Science | Tagged , | Comments Off on Peer-reviewed literature: What does it take to publish a scientific paper?