Follow The Logic of Science on Facebook.
- Follow The Logic of Science on WordPress.com
-
Join 181.3K other subscribers
Archives
- May 2026 (1)
- April 2026 (1)
- February 2026 (1)
- January 2026 (1)
- December 2025 (3)
- March 2025 (1)
- February 2025 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (1)
- September 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (1)
- October 2020 (1)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (3)
- June 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (8)
- February 2015 (10)
- January 2015 (17)
Tag Archives: evaluating evidence
Don’t be intellectually lazy
In recent conversations on this page, I have been struck by just how intellectually lazy science-deniers usually are. This is hardly a novel observation, but I think it bears discussion. I also want to note that this sort of lazy … Continue reading
Posted in Rules of Logic, Vaccines/Alternative Medicine
Tagged Bad arguments, evaluating evidence
Comments Off on Don’t be intellectually lazy
Masks and COVID vaccines were huge successes; ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were not
COVID19 presented an unprecedented challenge for modern science/medicine. Faced with a novel infectious disease, doctors, scientists, and health officials rose to the challenge in remarkable speed. That rate at which we went from never having heard of COVID19 to having … Continue reading
Posted in Vaccines/Alternative Medicine
Tagged covid, evaluating evidence, peer-reviewed studies, risk, Vaccines
Comments Off on Masks and COVID vaccines were huge successes; ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were not
Yes, you should fact-check
Yesterday, I posted the fairly innocuous image above on the TLoS Facebook page, and the results were both fascinating and horrifying. Numerous people took time out of their day to embarrass themselves by doubling down and attacking fact-checkers, often with … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Bad arguments, evaluating evidence, fact checking, media, news, social-media
Comments Off on Yes, you should fact-check
How well do you understand placebo effects?
“Placebo effect” is a term that almost everyone knows but few seem to understand. Misconceptions about placebo effects are rampant and usually center around the idea that a placebo effect occurs when you feel better because you thought a treatment … Continue reading
Posted in Vaccines/Alternative Medicine
Tagged alternative medicine, Bad arguments, evaluating evidence, placebos
Comments Off on How well do you understand placebo effects?
No, those photos don’t disprove sea level rise/climate change
It is an indisputable scientific fact that the average global sea level is increasing. Nevertheless, numerous memes and posts on the internet claim to have photographic proof that sea level rise (and by extension, global climate change) is a hoax. … Continue reading
Posted in Global Warming
Tagged Bad arguments, evaluating evidence, global climate change
Comments Off on No, those photos don’t disprove sea level rise/climate change
The Logic of Science 