Follow The Logic of Science on Facebook.
- Follow The Logic of Science on WordPress.com
-
Join 181,295 other subscribers
Archives
- September 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (1)
- October 2020 (1)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (3)
- June 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (8)
- February 2015 (10)
- January 2015 (17)
Tag Archives: ad hominem fallacies
The importance of logical fallacies
As anyone who frequents this blog knows, I spend a lot of time talking about logical fallacies. I frequently criticize peoples’ arguments for having them, and I present them as a reason for rejecting particular lines of thought. Nevertheless, many … Continue reading →
Posted in Rules of Logic
|
Tagged ad hominem fallacies, appeal to antiquity fallacies, appeal to authority fallacies, appeal to emotion fallacies, appeal to nature fallacies, argument from ignorance fallacies, Bad arguments, evaluating evidence, logical fallacies, post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacies, rules of logic
|
19 Comments
Are scientists arrogant, close-minded, and dismissive?
I spend a lot of time debating people who reject science, and I have observed a common tendency for people to try to dismiss scientific results by attacking scientists with accusations that they are, “arrogant,” “close-minded,” “dismissive” and don’t “take … Continue reading →
Posted in Nature of Science
|
Tagged ad hominem fallacies, anecdotal evidence, appeal to authority fallacies, burden of proof
|
27 Comments
The genetic fallacy: When is it okay to criticize a source?
Last week, I wrote a post on the hierarchy of scientific evidence which included the figure to the right. In that post, I explained why some types of scientific papers produced more robust results than others. Some people, however, took … Continue reading →
Posted in Rules of Logic
|
Tagged ad hominem fallacies, evaluating evidence, logical fallacies, rules of logic
|
17 Comments
Stop accusing me of ad hominem fallacies you stupid idiots
Ad hominem fallacies are among the most common logical fallacies, but they are also among the most misunderstood. Indeed, I often see people falsely accusing their opponent of committing an ad hominem fallacy. Therefore, I am going to explain how … Continue reading →
The Rules of Logic Part 3: Logical Fallacies
Perhaps the most common mistake that people make in debates is the use of logical fallacies. This occurs largely because people generally are not taught logical fallacies, and, therefore, don’t recognize them when they use or see them. Knowing logical … Continue reading →
Posted in Rules of Logic
|
Tagged ad hoc fallacies, ad hominem fallacies, alternative medicine, appeal to authority fallacies, appeal to emotion fallacies, appeal to nature fallacies, argument from ignorance fallacies, Bad arguments, correlation fallacies, evolution, global climate change, logical fallacies, post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacies, question begging fallacies, rules of logic, straw man fallacies, texas sharpshooter fallacies, Vaccines
|
6 Comments
The Logic of Science 