Follow The Logic of Science on Facebook.
- Follow The Logic of Science on WordPress.com
-
Join 181.3K other subscribers
Archives
- May 2026 (1)
- April 2026 (1)
- February 2026 (1)
- January 2026 (1)
- December 2025 (3)
- March 2025 (1)
- February 2025 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (1)
- September 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (1)
- October 2020 (1)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (3)
- June 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (8)
- February 2015 (10)
- January 2015 (17)
Author Archives: Fallacy Man
Basic Statistics Part 3: The Dangers of Large Data Sets: A Tale of P values, Error Rates, and Bonferroni Corrections
In previous posts, I have explained the importance of having lots of data, but what I failed to mention was the dangers of analyzing these large data sets. You see, all real data has variation in it, and when you … Continue reading
Posted in Nature of Science
Tagged evaluating evidence, peer-reviewed studies, sample size, statistics
2 Comments
What does it mean to be a skeptic?
It is good to be skeptical about everything that you hear and read. In fact, skepticism is one of the defining characteristics of a scientist. Nevertheless, terms like “skeptic” and “open-minded” are often misappropriated by people in the anti-science movement, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged anti vaccine arguments, evaluating evidence
Comments Off on What does it mean to be a skeptic?
Evolution is blind
One of the central tenets of evolutionary biology is the concept that evolution is blind. In other words, it has not foresight or goal. This principle is extremely important for understanding how evolution works, but it’s a concept that is … Continue reading
Posted in Science of Evolution
Tagged Bad arguments, evolution, evolution is blind, irreducible complexity, natural selection
Comments Off on Evolution is blind
7 easy ways to lose a debate
One of the saddest statistics about my life is the amount of time that I spend pointlessly debating anti-scientists. Having devoted so much time to this endeavor has, however, allowed me to observe certain patterns and trends in their debate … Continue reading
Posted in Global Warming, Rules of Logic, Science of Evolution, Vaccines/Alternative Medicine
Tagged anti vaccine arguments, Bad arguments, burden of proof, creationism, evaluating evidence, evolution, global climate change, logical fallacies, rules of logic, Vaccines
Comments Off on 7 easy ways to lose a debate
2 biggest lies of the anti-vaccine movement
It’s no great secret that the anti-vaccine movement is rife with scientific inaccuracies and logical fallacies, but a few of their claims are so extraordinarily erroneous and demonstrably false that I have difficulty calling them anything other lies. There are … Continue reading
Posted in Vaccines/Alternative Medicine
Tagged anti vaccine arguments, Bad arguments, measles, peer-reviewed studies, Vaccines
Comments Off on 2 biggest lies of the anti-vaccine movement
The Logic of Science 