Tag Archives: peer-reviewed studies

Even if medical errors were the 3rd leading cause of death, that wouldn’t be as bad as it sounds

Posted on June 1, 2016 by Fallacy Man

There has recently been a lot of hype over a “new” study claiming that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the US (this was really just a rehash of previous studies). Dr. Gorski has already done … Continue reading →

Posted in Vaccines/Alternative Medicine | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Most scientific studies are wrong, but that doesn’t mean what you think it means

Posted on May 10, 2016 by Fallacy Man

When faced with scientific studies that disagree with them, many people are prone to claim that they don’t have to accept those studies because most scientific studies are actually wrong. They generally try to support this claim by either citing … Continue reading →

Posted in Nature of Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Vaccines and autism: A thorough review of the evidence

Posted on April 28, 2016 by Fallacy Man

UPDATE March 2019: Since writing this post, anti-vaccer’s lists have grown and several new studies have been published. Therefore, I wrote an updated version of this article which you can read here. The evidence that vaccines don’t cause autism has … Continue reading →

Posted in Vaccines/Alternative Medicine | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 125 Comments

Understanding abstracts: Does the study say what you think it says?

Posted on March 22, 2016 by Fallacy Man

I spend a lot of time on this blog talking about scientific studies and how to analyze them, but there is a very important topic that, until now, I have only mentioned briefly: abstracts. Abstracts are intended to be useful … Continue reading →

Posted in Nature of Science | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Does Splenda cause cancer? A lesson in how to critically read scientific papers

Posted on March 13, 2016 by Fallacy Man

Last week, researchers published a paper suggesting that sucralose (Splenda) causes cancer in male mice. This has re-sparked an old debate, and various media outlets have been quick to pounce on the results and flood the internet with articles like, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nature of Science | Tagged , , , , | 15 Comments